The academic journal Place Branding and Public Diplomacy – a TPBO media partner – has always tracked the evolving relationship between technology, communication, and international relations. But its latest special issue, titled The End of Diplomacy? ChatGPT, Generative AI and the Future of Digital Diplomacy, lands at a particularly resonant moment.
Generative AI is no longer the stuff of speculative fiction or sealed-off labs. It is embedded in our inboxes, workflows, and everyday public discourse. What does this mean for diplomacy, where trust, nuance, and human presence are the very currency of exchange? This issue doesn’t claim to have all the answers, but it does pose the right questions – and frames them through the lenses of practice, theory, and ethics.
Reports Olga Rauhut Kompaniets, TPBO’s new Associate Editor, Research.
A Landscape in Flux
Three themes emerge. First: caution versus enthusiasm. Some contributors warn of techno-solutionism, others explore concrete use cases. Second: the irreplaceable human. Across the issue, one message is clear – empathy, negotiation, and trust cannot be automated. Third: literacy and governance. From bias to disinformation, practitioners are reminded that critical engagement with AI is a necessity, not a luxury.
This is a collection that offers neither panic nor techno-utopianism. Instead, it equips diplomats, scholars, and policymakers with frameworks, case studies, and provocations – tools for navigating a rapidly shifting terrain.
What Practitioners Should Know
The special issue draws together key lessons for those working at the frontlines of diplomacy and international communication:
- AI is not a shortcut. Tools may evolve, but diplomacy still relies on the fundamentals: trust, context, and emotional intelligence.
- Adopt with care. Don’t integrate AI everywhere. Assess where it truly adds value, and where human judgment must remain paramount.
- Acceleration is real. AI is moving fast across multiple domains. Know where your institution sits on that spectrum.
- Good data, good decisions. Digital diplomacy depends on reliable inputs. Bias in, bias out.
- Collaboration, not replacement. Machines should assist, not decide. Guardrails and governance are essential.
- Prepare for disinformation. The same tools that spread falsehoods can help detect them. Institutions need resilience.
- Watch the language. AI output shapes perception. Diplomats must read machine-generated content with a critical eye.
- Regulation is a bridge. Competing governance models may clash – but they also create space for cooperation.
- Treat AI as foreign. Diplomats have long engaged with the “other.” AI demands a similar mindset: curious, critical, alert.
- Context counts. Geopolitical approaches to AI differ. China’s use of AI, for instance, is tightly linked to ideology and strategic posture.
- Embrace uncertainty. AI tends toward overconfidence. Diplomacy thrives in ambiguity.
- Culture shift is key. Adopting AI is not just technical. It requires training, leadership, and alignment with diplomatic values.
Together, these points reinforce a central idea: AI will not replace diplomacy, but it will reshape its context, tools, and tempo. The challenge is to adopt it critically, ensuring that the core of diplomacy – human connection – is preserved, not displaced.
Highlights from the Issue
Each article in the issue contributes a different perspective, creating a mosaic of insight:
- Digital diplomacy in the age of technological acceleration: three impact scenarios of generative artificial intelligence – Corneliu Bjola and Ilan Manor propose a dual lens of “horizontal” and “vertical” acceleration – how widely and how deeply AI permeates diplomatic practice. Their scenarios range from AI as assistant to AI overtaking core functions, and they ask: are we nearing the end of diplomacy as we know it?
- Yet another turn? Prioritising the needs of diplomacy over the capabilities of generative AI – Efe Sevin and M. Evren Eken offer a sceptical view of AI as the next big “turn” in international relations. They argue that diplomacy’s core practices – trust, empathy, communication – remain fundamentally human.
- First contact: integrating generative AI into digital diplomatic intelligence – In a second contribution, Bjola and Manor explore the potential of Digital Diplomatic Intelligence (DDI), where AI augments risk assessment and policy design. They stress three conditions: data quality, algorithmic design, and ethical collaboration.
- Assessing the risks and opportunities posed by AI-enhanced influence operations – Rolf Fredheim and James Pamment assess the real-time risks of AI-powered influence operations. The threat, they argue, lies not in autonomous systems, but in human-AI collaborations – troll farms, misinformation networks, and the like.
- Terminology, AI bias, and the risks of current digital public diplomacy practices – Zhao Alexandre Huang explores how biased AI terminology can skew diplomatic narratives. His takeaway: language matters. Diplomats must be AI-literate not just technically, but semantically.
- Diplomatic relationship-building in the age of generative AI: the European Union and China – Lucie Qian Xia contrasts EU and Chinese approaches to AI regulation, suggesting that shared ethical concerns may actually serve as a bridge rather than a barrier in international relations.
- The Other in the machine: diplomacy and the AI conundrum – Eugenio V. Garcia draws from anthropology to frame AI as an “alien Other” in diplomacy. His essay is a philosophical provocation, urging diplomats to treat AI as something profoundly unfamiliar.
- Generative AI and the future for China’s diplomacy – Juan Luis Manfredi-Sánchez and Pablo Sebastian Morales examine China’s strategic integration of generative AI into its diplomatic playbook. They identify four challenges: securitisation, techno-socialism, censorship, and narrative control.
- Navigating uncertainty: public diplomacy vs. AI – Luigi Di Martino and Heather Ford make a compelling case for ambiguity. While AI delivers confident outputs, diplomacy flourishes in grey zones. Their call: resist the algorithmic urge for certainty.
Final Word
This special issue is not a roadmap – but a compass. It invites public diplomacy professionals to navigate the age of AI with both curiosity and caution. The technology is here. The question is how we meet it.
Read the full issue here.
Have a research story to share? Let us know!
