Featured:
Global City Index
Published by: Brand Finance
First published in 2023, evaluates the perceptions of 100 cities worldwide by surveying over 15,000 respondents across 20 countries. The index assesses each city's Familiarity, Reputation, and Consideration as places to live, work locally and remotely, study, retire, visit, and invest.
What Experts Say
Comprehensive ranking with a wide range of indicators, providing valuable insights for investors and policymakers.
Considerations: Relatively new to the market, so of limited use to track performance over time.
Note: Custom reports are available for city-specific insights and strategy recommendations.
Contact: Konrad Jagodzinski
Alphabetically:
Arcadis Sustainable Cities Index
Published by: Arcadis
First published in 2015, this index evaluates 100 global cities across four pillars: Planet, People, Profit, and Progress. Using 67 metrics, it assesses factors such as air pollution, waste management, economic performance, social equity, and resilience. The Progress pillar highlights changes over the past decade towards achieving sustainability goals.
What Experts Say
Credible framework for evaluating urban sustainability efforts with a broad range of indicators.
Considerations: Some experts feel it lacks cultural and social dimensions, focusing mainly on environmental aspects.
Global Financial Centres Index
Published by: Z/Yen Group
First published in 2007, this index evaluates the competitiveness of financial centres worldwide, compiled biannually by the Z/Yen Group and the China Development Institute. It uses over 100 quantitative measures from sources like the World Bank and OECD, combined with survey responses from finance professionals, to assess business environment, financial sector development, infrastructure, human capital, and reputation.
What Experts Say
Highly valued for providing strategic insights into financial performance and business environment, especially useful for guiding resource allocation based on economic trends.
Considerations: Strong emphasis on traditional financial metrics, lacking social and environmental dimensions.
Global Power City Index (GPCI)
Published by: The Mori Memorial Foundation
First published in 2008, evaluates major cities worldwide based on their "magnetism," or their comprehensive ability to attract people, capital, and enterprises. The GPCI assesses cities across six functions: Economy, Research and Development, Cultural Interaction, Livability, Environment, and Accessibility.
What Experts Say
Highly credible and comprehensive, covering economic, cultural, and social aspects with a balanced view.
Considerations: Lacks granularity when it comes to smaller cities; focuses mostly on major global hubs and may therefore overlook emerging “up and coming” cities.
IESE Cities in Motion Index
Published by: IESE Business School
First published in 2014, this index evaluates cities worldwide to assess their sustainability and quality of life. Developed by the IESE Business School, the index examines cities through nine dimensions: economy, human capital, social cohesion, environment, governance, urban planning, international outreach, technology, and mobility and transportation.
What Experts Say
Comprehensive framework covering multiple aspects of city performance.
Considerations: Broad focus, perhaps best used together with more focused rankings to get the most value.
IMD Smart City Index
Published by: IMD Business School
First published in 2019, evaluates cities worldwide on their integration of technology to enhance residents' quality of life. Developed by the IMD Smart City Observatory, the index assesses 142 cities using economic and technological data alongside citizens' perceptions. The evaluation focuses on two main pillars: Structures (infrastructure) and Technology (digital services), examining areas such as health and safety, mobility, activities, opportunities, and governance.
What Experts Say
Uses valuable statistical data which provides insights into how cities leverage technology to address urban challenges and improve livability.
Considerations: Strong focus on technological factors, overlooking broader urban management challenges.
Innovation Cities Index
Published by: 2thinknow
First published in 2007, assesses the innovation potential of 500 cities globally. It evaluates 162 indicators across three key factors: cultural assets, human infrastructure, and networked markets. These indicators encompass areas such as technology, economics, culture, and sustainability. The index offers insights into cities' capacities to foster innovation and economic growth, serving as a resource for policymakers, businesses, and investors.
What Experts Say
Recognized for its broad analysis of city innovation potential.
Considerations: Criticized for occasionally over-relying on tech-related metrics, neglecting cultural or social innovation.
Kearney Global Cities Report
Published by: Kearney
First published in 2008, evaluates cities worldwide based on their ability to attract, retain, and generate global flows of capital, people, and ideas. The report features the Global Cities Index, which assesses cities across five key dimensions: business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experience, and political engagement.
What Experts Say
Valued for providing insights into cities’ global connectivity and attractiveness for business.
Considerations: Heavily focused on major cities, leaving out smaller or emerging cities.
Mercer Cost of Living Ranking
Published by: Mercer
First published in 1994, this survey evaluates over 200 items in 226 cities worldwide, including housing, transportation, food, clothing, household goods, and entertainment. New York City serves as the base city, with currency movements measured against the US dollar. The survey helps multinational companies and governments determine compensation allowances for expatriate employees.
What Experts Say
Useful for HR departments and organizations planning international assignments.
Considerations: Limited to expatriate-related cost assessments; does not provide broader economic or cultural insights.
Mercer Quality of Living City Ranking
Published by: Mercer
First published in 1994, this ranking evaluates cities worldwide to assist multinational companies and governments in determining compensation for international assignees. It assesses cities based on 39 factors grouped into 10 categories, including political and social environment, economic environment, socio-cultural environment, medical and health considerations, education, public services, recreation, consumer goods, housing, and natural environment.
What Experts Say
Highly regarded for providing detailed comparisons of living conditions for expatriates.
Considerations: Limited focus on cultural and economic factors; mainly targets relocation and HR-related decision-making.
Numbeo Cost of Living Index
Published by: Numbeo
Established in 2009, this crowd-sourced database compares the relative cost of living between cities worldwide. It evaluates consumer goods prices, including groceries, restaurants, transportation, and utilities, excluding rent. The index uses New York City as a baseline, assigning it a value of 100; for example, a city with a score of 120 is estimated to be 20% more expensive than New York (excluding rent).
What Experts Say
Frequently updated, providing real-time insights from user contributions.
Considerations: Data quality may vary due to its crowd-sourced nature.
Numbeo Quality of Life Index
Published by: Numbeo
Established in 2009, this crowd-sourced index evaluates cities and countries worldwide based on factors such as purchasing power, safety, healthcare, cost of living, property price to income ratio, traffic commute time, pollution, and climate. It provides a comparative measure to assist individuals and professionals in assessing living conditions across different locations.
What Experts Say
Provides a broad understanding of living conditions across cities.
Considerations: Crowd-sourced data may not always be reliable or consistent.
Oxford Economics Global Cities Index
Published by: Oxford Economics
First published in 2024, this index evaluates the world's 1,000 largest cities across five categories: economics, human capital, quality of life, environment, and governance. Utilizing 27 indicators, it offers a comprehensive assessment of urban strengths and weaknesses, assisting businesses, policymakers, and researchers in strategic decision-making.
What Experts Say
Robust economic forecasting with well-rounded, data-driven insights. A valuable tool for policymakers and city planners.
Considerations: Focuses heavily on economic indicators, with less attention given to softer metrics like culture and livability. New study, making it difficult to compare performance over time.
QS Best Student Cities
Published by: QS Quacquarelli Symonds
First published in 2012, the QS Best Student Cities ranking evaluates urban destinations worldwide based on their appeal and benefits to students. The 2025 edition assesses 150 cities using six key indicators: university rankings, student mix, desirability, employer activity, affordability, and student voice.
What Experts Say
Praised for its comprehensive approach, providing valuable insights into the student experience across various urban centers.
Considerations: The reliance on available data and surveys may introduce biases. The weighting of indicators might not reflect individual student priorities.
Resonance World’s Best Cities Report
Published by: Resonance Consultancy
First published in 2014, this report evaluates global cities based on a combination of statistical performance and qualitative evaluations from online sources such as Google, Tripadvisor, and Instagram. The assessment focuses on three key factors: livability, lovability, and prosperity, which are used to calculate the proprietary Place Power™ Score. Provides insights into the overall appeal and attractiveness of cities worldwide.
What Experts Say
Popular for blending quantitative data with real-world perceptions; provides dynamic insights.
Considerations: Perceived as more engagement-focused than analytical, potentially less rigorous than other rankings.