Tokyo, together with the Greater Tokyo Area, is the most populous metropolitan area in the world, with 39 million residents. Japan‘s capital city since 1869, it has extensive economic, political, and social power in the Asian region. But how does the Japanese metropolis perform in global rankings that measure the competitiveness of cities in terms of innovation, reputation and influence, business attractiveness, and sustainability?

Let’s take a closer look at:

  • Tokyo’s competitiveness and financial performance
  • Its brand strength and global attractiveness
  • Livability: how appealing for talent, visitors, and locals?

Economic Competitiveness and Financial Performance

The Global Financial Centres Index 34 ranks Tokyo 20th, jumping one position from the previous ranking—currently between Amsterdam (19th) and Dubai (21st). The city holds a strong standing in the following areas of competitiveness: Human Capital (13th) and Reputational & General (13th). It also performs very well in the following industry sectors: Government & Regulatory (6th) and Trading (12th). Tokyo holds the seventh place in the Asia-Pacific region, comparable with Beijing and Sydney.

According to 2thinknow’s Innovation Cities Index 2022-2023, Tokyo maintains the 1st position globally.


Tokyo’s Brand Strength and Global Attractiveness 

According to Brand Finance’s City Index 2023, Tokyo ranks 7th globally, comparable with Singapore (6th) and San Francisco (8th).

Resonance’s 2023 World’s Best Cities Report ranks Tokyo 4th, scoring 11th in Prosperity, 4th in Lovability, and 3rd in Livability. It ranks first for restaurants and shopping. Overall, it currently sits between New York City (3rd) and Singapore (5th).

Kearney’s 2023 Global Cities Report continues to rank Tokyo 4th globally and 23rd in its Global Cities Outlook—a slight improvement of two positions from the previous ranking.

The Global Power City Index ranks Tokyo 3rd. In terms of function-specific rankings, the city ranks 10th in Economy, 4th in R&D, 5th in Cultural Interaction, 3rd in Livability, 16th in Environment, and 8th in Accessibility. Tokyo ranks 22nd in Variety of Workplace Positions, 12th in Winners of Prizes in Science and Technology, 30th for Nightlife Options, 4th for Number of Retail Shops, 40th for Urban Greenery, and 37th for Average Speed. Lastly, its appeal is 17th among Highly-skilled Workers, 12th among Corporate Executives, 5th among Residents, and 2nd among Tourists.


Livability: How Attractive as a Place to Live, Work, and Study?

The Mercer Quality of Living City Ranking places Tokyo 50th, sitting between Aberdeen (49th) and Edinburgh (51st). Mercer’s Cost of Living Ranking puts it 19th, a drop of ten positions from the previous ranking. It now sits between Dubai (18th) and Shenzhen (20th).

According to the Best Urban Cities for Digital Nomads list by Spot a Home, Tokyo ranks 53rd out of 56 global cities. It currently sits between Dubai (52nd) and New York (54th).

Lastly, Tokyo is home to some of the best universities in the world. According to The Times Higher Education Ranking, the University of Tokyo ranks 29th globally. The QS World University Ranking positions the same institution 28th, and Tokyo Institute of Technology 91st.


Urban Sustainability

The Arcadis Sustainability City Index 2022 ranks Tokyo 3rd overall, comparable with Stockholm (2nd) and Copenhagen (4th). Its pillar rankings are the following: Planet 7th, People 7th, Profit 20th. Its strengths are transport, connectivity, and green finance. Employment and affordability are two areas that could be improved, according to the study.


Last updated in January 2024. Explore more city profiles in our City Observatory.


Enjoyed our summary of global rankings and indices on Tokyo’s economic performance, its sustainability, attractiveness for talent, investors, visitors, city brand strength and reputation? Spread the word!


Disclaimer: The information in this article is intended to provide a general overview of Tokyo’s economic and cultural landscape and facilitate comparison over time. While we strive for accuracy and completeness, we are not responsible for any typographical errors or inaccuracies. The data is provided ‘as is’ without warranty of any kind. Users should verify any information before relying on it for decision-making purposes.