Public Vs. Private Sector Branding Explained: Similarities and Differences

Which are the similarities and differences between public and private sector branding?

Yet another valuable question from one of our readers (want to propose a question? Here's how). Below the answers of our panel of place branding specialists (in alphabetical order –  highlighted respondents are available for consulting, research or as speakers).

A few key takeaways:

  • Private brands are built to benefit a few. Public brands are for everyone.
  • The private sector has more control over the brand touch points than the public sector, which has to deal with and coordinate a multiple and diverse array of stakeholders.
  • Private branding requires fewer layers of approval. Budgets are not as fixed.
  • Both public and private sector branding require the same rigor to develop and project – in terms of research, honesty in interpreting results, and creative storytelling. Both must be based on substance, to establish credibility.
  • Public sector branding is more time-consuming to develop, harder to ensure focus, and more open to media criticism and public vilification.
  • Private brands tend to be owned by companies; whereas public brands are owned by no-one but emotionally invested in by almost everyone.
  • Private sector branding is essentially about a commercial transaction. Place branding usually serves territory revitalization.

You'd like to read the full story? Please log in or (if you are not yet a subscriber) support our work by joining TPBO Premium.

The Editorial Team

Stay up to date on latest place brand insights, strategies, stories and examples: join our mailing list! You'll receive an email summary of highlights every month. Benefit from more frequent updates by following us now on LinkedIn, Facebook or Twitter!